August 30, 1984
I have today signed H.J. Res. 600, the agricultural trade and export policy commission act.
H.J. Res. 600 would establish a National Commission on Agricultural Trade and Export Policy to
conduct studies of agricultural trade and export policies, programs, and practices of the United
States, and to make recommendations to the President and Congress.
The congressional sponsors of this legislation see the Commission's work as providing
recommendations for the agriculture community, the administration, and the Congress to consider
as they work together in developing the 1985 farm bill. I expect the 1985 farm bill to be an
historic watershed in laying the groundwork for assuring the continuation of a prosperous and
productive agricultural economy. While I am not convinced that we need yet another commission
to study agricultural policy, I hope the Commission will constructively join the debate on the
future direction of American agriculture, including that of agricultural trade and exports.
Numerous other groups, including the President's Export Council, official industry advisory
groups, and the President's Working Group on Future Food and Agriculture Policy, are also
examining the many issues that can affect the future course of American agriculture. We hope that
the free exchange and critical review of all such views will lead to the development of farm
legislation that sets a sound course for agricultural policy.
In signing H.J. Res. 600, however, I must express my concern about the membership of the
Commission. Under this resolution the Commission is to be composed of 3 officers from the
executive branch, who serve in a nonvoting capacity, and 32 members who are either selected by,
or are Members of, Congress. Although the Commission would appear to serve primarily
legislative functions, this bill would place the Commission partly within the executive branch. I
believe that creation of such a commission, which is neither clearly within the executive branch,
nor clearly within the legislative branch, tends to blur the functional distinction between the
governmental branches that is fundamental to the concept of separation of powers. It would be
more appropriate for the Commission to be composed either entirely of members selected by the
legislative branch, if it is to serve primarily legislative functions, or entirely of members appointed
by the President, if it is to serve the executive branch.
Moreover, I do not consider it advisable to have the Secretary of Agriculture or any other
executive branch official receive private donations to assist the Commission. The Department of
Agriculture will provide such staff resources as are needed from existing resources and make use
of Commodity Credit Corporation funds as authorized to cover travel expenses, per diem, and
other expenses as needed.
Note: As enacted, H.J. Res. 600 is Public Law 98 - 412, approved August 30.