December 12, 1985
Today I have signed H.J. Res. 372, which increases the statutory limit on the public debt and
includes the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, also known as the
Gramm-Rudman-Hollings amendment. With the passage of this landmark legislation, the
Congress has made an important step toward putting our fiscal house in order. Deficit reduction is
no longer simply our hope and our goal; deficit reduction is now the law. From here to the end of
the decade, mandated cuts can put the deficit on a declining path and eliminate governmental
overspending by 1991. It is my hope that we will move even one step further to secure the gains
we have made by adopting a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.
Deficits have threatened our economic well-being for too long. For years the Congress has talked
about the deficit, and now it has done something about it. But the tough work of controlling
Federal spending still lies ahead. It is important that we now cooperate in good faith toward
building a solid fiscal foundation for economic growth. This legislation mandates that the
President and the Congress work together to eliminate the deficit over the next 5 years. The first
step in that process will begin early next year. At that time I anticipate that we will have to take
some significant across-the-board reductions in a wide range of programs. That means cutting
back on the expansion of government, an expansion which has slowed, but which still continues
apace. Whether increased government spending is financed through taxes or borrowing, it
imposes a heavy burden on the private economy, the source of our prosperity and the foundation
of our hopes for the future. That is why increasing taxes is not an option: Deficit reduction must
mean spending reductions. We must also never lose sight of the necessity to maintain a strong
national defense. Restoring our defenses has been vital not only to our security but to the cause of
freedom. Today our once ailing alliances are stronger than before. America is looked upon with
renewed admiration around the world, and the principles of human freedom that we embody are
no longer in retreat. I am confident that implementing our previous agreements with Congress for
steady real growth in defense will keep our defenses secure.
In signing this bill, I am mindful of the serious constitutional questions raised by some of its
provisions. The bill assigns a significant role to the Director of the Congressional Budget Office
and the Comptroller General in calculating the budget estimates that trigger the operative
provisions of the bill. Under the system of separated powers established by the Constitution,
however, executive functions may only be performed by officers in the executive branch. The
Director of the Congressional Budget Office and the Comptroller General are agents of Congress,
not officers in the executive branch. The bill itself recognizes this problem and provides
procedures for testing the constitutionality of the dubious provisions. The bill also provides a
constitutionally valid alternative mechanism should the role of the Director of the Congressional
Budget Office and the Comptroller General be struck down. It is my hope that these outstanding
constitutional questions can be promptly resolved.
Similar constitutional concerns are raised by a provision in the bill authorizing the President to
terminate or modify defense contracts for deficit reduction purposes, but only if the action is
approved by the Comptroller General. Under our constitutional system, an agent of Congress may
not exercise such supervisory authority over the President. As the Supreme Court made clear in
its Chadha decision, Congress can veto Presidential action only through the constitutionally
established procedure of passing a bill through both Houses and presenting it to the President.
My administration alerted Congress to these various problems throughout the legislative process
in an effort to achieve a bill free of constitutionally suspect provisions. Although we were
unsuccessful in this goal, I am nonetheless signing the bill. In doing so, I am in no sense dismissing
the constitutional problems or acquiescing in a violation of the system of separated powers
carefully crafted by the framers of the Constitution. Rather, it is my hope that the constitutional
problems will be promptly resolved so that the vitally important business of deficit reduction can
proceed.
In addition, the legislation also increases the debt ceiling so that the Federal Government can
continue to meet its financial obligations.
The many Senators and Representatives whose hard work has borne fruit in this bill are to be
commended. The American people expect their elected officials to take action now to reduce the
size of government and to set upon a reasonable and equitable course to eliminate Federal budget
deficits. I am unequivocally committed to that goal. I am hopeful and confident that Congress will
act responsibly in meeting its obligations under the bill and thus in future years will render
implementation of the automatic budget reduction mechanism unnecessary. Deficit reduction is on
the horizon. We are embarked on this promising new path together, and together we will make it
work.
Note: H.J. Res. 372, approved December 12, was assigned Public Law No. 99 - 177.