Statement by Principal
Deputy Press Secretary Speakes on the Renegotiation
of the Multifiber Arrangement
August 1, 1986
The
President today announced that U.S. trade officials have
successfully renegotiated a stronger and more comprehensive multifiber
arrangement (MFA) that will help the textile and apparel industries compete
more fairly in the international marketplace.
When
the President vetoed the Textile and Apparel Trade Enforcement Act of 1985 last
December, he directed the Office of the United States Trade Representative to
aggressively renegotiate the MFA ``on terms no less favorable than present.''
The new 5-year MFA concluded this morning in Geneva significantly improves
on the MFA that expired on July 31. It expands coverage to previously
uncontrolled fibers such as ramie, linen, and silk blends, so that textile
products made of fabrics engineered to circumvent our bilateral agreements can
be restrained. It also provides a mechanism to prevent destructive import
surges and improves provisions to prevent fraud. We also made clear in these
negotiations that we would continue to pursue measures in our bilateral
agreements that will open markets to our textile exports. The new MFA, coupled
with tougher bilateral agreements with major trading partners such as Taiwan and Hong Kong, will allow us to
moderate growth in textile and apparel imports without incurring reprisals
against U.S. exports abroad.
This
is an orderly and positive program that stands in sharp contrast with the
sledgehammer approach of the Textile and Apparel Trade Enforcement Act. That
legislation would cost consumers an extra $44 billion for clothing over the
next 5 years -- $70,000 for each job supposedly protected by the bill. And by
requiring the unilateral and illegal abrogation of our international
agreements, the bill would guarantee retaliation against U.S. exporters -- including
the agricultural, aerospace, and high-technology, electronics sectors --
threatening the jobs of the 5 million Americans who produce goods for export.
It would pit industry against industry, worker against worker, and region
against region. If this legislation becomes law, our trading partners would
likely refuse to adhere to the multifiber arrangement
and other international agreements. By renegotiating the MFA, we have provided
the maximum possible protection for American textile workers without
sacrificing jobs in our healthy export industries or overburdening American
consumers.