Remarks at a White House
Briefing for Members of the National Law Enforcement Council
It's
a pleasure welcoming you to the White House complex, you chiefs of police,
state troopers, sheriffs, and other members of the National Law Enforcement
Council. And it's quite a difference from my first experience with one of your
kind, when I was about so high and had some fireworks in the wrong place.
[Laughter] And after my father paid the fine, there were fireworks at home.
[Laughter]
Well,
seeing so many of you reminds me of a story. And you
may have heard, everything reminds me of a story. This one concerns a fellow
who was in a small automobile accident, one of those fender-bender types. And
he got out, and the other fellow got out of his car, and neither one of them
were hurt. But the other fellow said, ``Hey, you look a little shaken up. Wait
a minute here.'' And he went back to his car, got a bottle, handed it to him,
and said, ``Here, take a drink of this. It will settle you down.'' So, the man
did. And he said, ``Oh, come on, take another one. I know you're shaken up.''
And he did. And three or four drinks later the fellow said, ``Well, wait a
minute here. I don't want to drink it all. You have a drink.'' And he said,
``No, I'll just stand here and wait for the police to get here.'' [Laughter]
Well,
this year we celebrate the 200th anniversary of the framing of the
Constitution. And in the history of nations, ours is a young nation. The
nations of
You
know, a few years ago it seemed that some people who should have known better
had forgotten the basic truth that law, order, and liberty go hand in hand. Too
many courts appeared to regard the serious business of ensuring our domestic
peace and protecting our nation's communities against crime as a kind of
intricate game that pitted police officers against clever lawyers. And always
we heard about the rights of criminals, rarely those of their victims.
In
the last 7 years, a balance has begun once again to return to
When
I first came into office, I promised a massive attack on organized crime, a
social evil that had been tolerated too long in our nation. I said we were
declaring war on the mob -- its drug peddling, yes, but also its influence in
every form of racketeering and its capacity to corrupt business, unions, and
public law enforcement officials. When I announced this attack on the mob in
1982, I also announced a wide-ranging series of steps from new preventive and
investigative measures to the appointment of a Presidential commission on
organized crime. Some, of course, were skeptical, but the evidence is now in
from all around the country. We're winning, and these are no longer just
tactical victories. We have a full-fledged strategic assault underway, and the
mob is on the run. Around the country, Federal prosecutors are winning
convictions against the working heads of organized crime, and the Mafia's
national board of directors, the infamous ``commission,'' has been put behind
bars. Meanwhile, drug seizures have reached record levels. Drug arrests have
gone up and have included some of the most notorious figures in the drug
underworld.
Three
years ago, after long stalling, the Congress at last passed the Comprehensive
Crime Control Act. The act eliminated parole and reduced the amount of time off
for good behavior that could be granted a prisoner. The United States
Sentencing Commission was also established, and it has drafted guidelines that
make sentences more predictable. The Crime Control Act also included new provisions,
like rules for confiscating drug assets. I can't tell you what a kick it was
for me the first time, early on in my term, down in
Last
year the average Federal prison sentence for a drug offense was almost
40-percent lower [longer] than it was in 1979. The average fraud and weapons
possession sentences were more than 40-percent lower [longer]. Overall, Federal
sentences have averaged more than 30-percent longer than they had 7 years
before. Put another way, in 1979 the average Federal sentence for drug dealers
was over 50 months. Since then it has climbed steadily to 70 months, and drug
convictions have doubled. Some of you may have been involved in the National
Narcotics Border Interdiction System that works under the direction of Vice
President Bush.
One
critically important part of the criminal justice system is the judiciary.
Federal judges have also been getting tougher on criminals and the sentencing
figures, as they suggest. And I'm told that I've appointed 4 of every 10 judges
that are sitting on the bench today. Several weeks ago, I made another
nomination to the Federal Bench, one I'm particularly proud of, and I know that
you've heard about him already this morning: Robert Bork. I believe that Judge
Bork will be an extraordinary addition to the United States Supreme Court. He
has already had a remarkable legal career. As a partner in a leading law firm,
he was recognized as among the best in his field. As a professor at Yale, he
became one of the preeminent legal scholars of our time. And as a judge on the
most important appeals court in the country, he has been widely acclaimed for
his intellectual power and his fairness. No man in
Furthermore,
in his 5 years on the bench, Judge Bork has demonstrated a clear understanding
of the appropriate role of the judiciary in our constitutional system. Many
years ago a great Justice, Felix Frankfurter, defined his role when he said: ``The highest exercise of judicial duty is to subordinate
one's personal pulls and one's private views to the law.'' This is called the
doctrine of judicial restraint. And as Lloyd Cutler, President Carter's White
House Counsel, recently wrote, I quote: ``All justices subscribe at least nominally
to this philosophy, but few rigorously observe it. Justices Oliver Wendell
Holmes, Louis D. Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, Potter Stewart, and Lewis F.
Powell, Jr., were among those few, and Judge Bork's articles and opinions
confirm that he would be another.'' If I could appoint a whole Supreme Court of
Felix Frankfurters, I would. And I've taken a step, I think, with Robert Bork.
The
Supreme Court has shown its own esteem for Robert Bork. Judge Bork has written
more than 100 majority opinions and joined in another 300 majority opinions.
The Supreme Court has never reversed a single one of these more than 400
opinions. That's a vote of confidence any judge in
Judge
Bork deserves to be evaluated on his merits. He deserves to be considered
promptly. Justice Powell has noted that when the Court is below full strength,
it has an adverse effect on the Court's business. I hope the Senate will take
note of this concern. One way or another, it should act on Judge Bork's
nomination before the Court goes into session in October. Each Senator must
decide which criteria is right for casting this
critical vote: qualifications or politics. I hope you'll join me in urging the
Senate to confirm Judge Bork. I feel the American people want criminals going
to jail while constitutional rights are preserved. So, please tell your
Senators that you'll stand by them if they support Judge Bork. I can't think of
any better way of marking this 200th anniversary of the framing of our noble
Constitution than by placing a Justice of Robert Bork's quality on the United
States Supreme Court.
I
just want to confirm how strongly I feel about you and law enforcement. There's
a member of the Secret Service today who was formerly a policeman in
But
I think we've had enough of diaper cases and that sort of thing in this land.
And you ought to be freed of any such disappointments as he had when he came
into court with the evidence. So, I thank you all, and God bless you all.
Note: The President
spoke at